Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): What You Need to Know

Retrieval-Augmented Generation, commonly known as RAG, is an artificial intelligence (AI) architecture that significantly improves the quality and reliability of outputs from large language models (LLMs). At its core, RAG works by granting LLMs access to external, up-to-date knowledge bases before generating a response to a user's query.

This process connects the generalized knowledge embedded in the LLM's training data with specific, authoritative information, making the AI system much more effective for specific domains or organizational knowledge.

Why RAG is Essential for Modern AI

Foundation models, which are the base LLMs, are trained on massive amounts of generalized, often static, data. This can lead to several problems when they are applied in real-world business settings:

  1. Hallucinations: The model may present false or inaccurate information when it does not have the correct answer.
  2. Stale Data: Responses can be outdated or generic if the user requires current, specific information.
  3. Non-Authoritative Sources: The LLM might generate a response without grounding it in verified, trusted sources.

RAG directly addresses these challenges. By redirecting the LLM to retrieve relevant information from predefined knowledge sources, organizations gain greater control over the generated text output. For example, in a corporate setting like Norma, RAG ensures the AI only uses the facility’s authorized data, never external or unverified content. This architectural consideration makes the system trustworthy and aligned with current data.

How Retrieval-Augmented Generation Works

The RAG process typically involves three main steps:

1. Creating the Knowledge Library

Before a query is even received, an organization’s documents (like manuals, reports, or policy documents) are prepared. Another AI method, known as embedding language models, converts this textual data into numerical representations called vectors. These vectors are stored in a specialized system known as a vector database, creating a knowledge library that the generative AI models can interpret. The process of breaking up the data into manageable pieces is called chunking.

2. Retrieval and Prompt Augmentation

When a user submits a query, the RAG system first searches the vector database to find the most relevant document chunks based on the user's question. This step is the "Retrieval" part of RAG.

Next, the retrieved information is used to augment the user’s original input. This is done through techniques often referred to as prompt engineering, where the relevant retrieved data is added to the user's prompt in context. The system is essentially supplying the LLM with the necessary background information it needs to formulate a correct response.

3. Generation

Finally, the LLM takes the augmented prompt—which includes the new knowledge from the retrieval step and its internal training data—to synthesize a more accurate, context-aware, and helpful answer tailored to the user. Many models also incorporate additional steps, such as re-ranking the retrieved information, to improve the final quality of the output. The output can include citations or references to the original sources, allowing users to verify the information.

Benefits of Adopting RAG

Implementing RAG technology offers significant advantages for generative AI systems:

  • Accuracy and Reliability: By grounding the LLM in current, verified sources, RAG dramatically reduces the likelihood of incorrect information or "hallucinations." Users can trust the information provided.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Retraining foundational LLMs with domain-specific information is computationally and financially expensive. RAG offers a less costly way to specialize the model, as it uses the existing LLM and simply supplies external information at the time of the query.
  • Currency of Information: RAG can connect LLMs to constantly refreshed sources, such as live data feeds or frequently updated internal documents. This capability ensures that the AI system retrieves context reflecting the present moment rather than relying on historical snapshots.
  • Transparency and Verification: A key advantage is the ability to present accurate information along with source attribution. Providing citations increases transparency, as users can cross-check retrieved content to confirm its relevance and validity.

While RAG greatly improves accuracy, it is worth noting that it does not completely stop all model hallucinations, as the LLM may still generate text around the source material. However, it represents a substantial step forward in creating responsible and reliable AI applications.

Frequently Asked Questions About RAG

What does RAG stand for?

RAG stands for Retrieval-Augmented Generation. It describes an architecture where an AI model retrieves information from external documents before generating its final answer.

Does RAG replace the need for LLMs?

No, RAG does not replace LLMs. Instead, it works with LLMs, supplementing their general knowledge with domain-specific, verified information retrieved from a knowledge base to produce more accurate outputs.

What is the main benefit of using RAG over just an LLM?

The main benefit is improved accuracy and the grounding of responses in authoritative sources. This approach prevents the LLM from relying solely on its potentially outdated training data, reducing errors and increasing user confidence through source citations.

Is RAG expensive to implement?

Compared to the cost of fully retraining a foundational LLM for a specific domain, RAG is a cost-effective alternative. It allows organizations to update the AI's knowledge base simply by updating the external documents and the corresponding vector database.

More Glossary items

War widow and widower pensions provide vital financial support to the surviving partners of veterans. These government payments are generally non-taxable and are treated differently in aged care assessments, often reducing or eliminating means-tested care fees for residential or home care services. Understanding how these pensions interact with aged care fees can help recipients plan their finances and maintain access to essential services.
This guide explains aged care support options for Australian veterans and war widows/widowers. It covers eligibility for government-funded aged care services, access to Department of Veterans' Affairs (DVA) support, and how pensions affect aged care fees. The article highlights the importance of recognising the unique needs of this group to ensure respectful and appropriate care.
The System Governor plays a vital role in Australia’s aged care system, overseeing service quality, continuity, and fair access for older Australians. This post explains its responsibilities, including policy development, provider accountability, and initiatives like Star Ratings, ensuring that aged care services are reliable, safe, and equitable.
Substitute decision-making is used when an older person can no longer make important decisions on their own. A substitute decision-maker steps in to make choices about medical treatment, personal care, and living arrangements. Their role is to follow the person’s known wishes or act in their best interests when those wishes are not clear. Families can plan ahead by legally appointing someone they trust, and any valid Advance Care Directive must be followed. Understanding how substitute decision-making works helps ensure the person’s rights, preferences, and wellbeing remain at the centre of care.
Supported decision making is a rights-based approach that helps you stay in control of your life as you receive aged care services. Instead of others making choices for you, this approach focuses on giving you the information, tools, and support you need to make your own decisions. This support can come from family members, friends, or independent advocates who help you understand options and express your preferences.
The Aged Care Statement of Rights outlines the protections every older person can expect when receiving funded aged care services in Australia. It affirms core rights such as independence, choice, equitable access, quality and safe care, privacy, and clear communication. The Statement also ensures that individuals can speak up, provide feedback, or make complaints without fear of unfair treatment. For providers, it establishes clear responsibilities to act in line with these rights and demonstrate genuine understanding in daily practice. This framework places the dignity, identity, and preferences of the older person at the centre of all care decisions.
Self-advocacy is the ability to speak up for your needs, preferences, and rights when receiving aged care. It helps maintain autonomy, ensure quality services, and improve communication with care providers. By asking questions, expressing preferences, raising concerns, and keeping simple records, individuals can take an active role in directing their care. When extra support is needed, family, friends, or independent advocates can help ensure the person’s voice remains central to all decisions.
Sanctions in Australian Aged Care are serious regulatory actions taken when a provider fails to meet required quality and safety standards. This article explains what sanctions are, why they are imposed, and the steps that lead to them, including Notices to Remedy and decisions by the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission. It outlines common sanction conditions, their impact on providers, and what they mean for residents. The summary also answers key questions about sanction duration, consequences for ongoing non-compliance, how to find sanctioned facilities, and resident rights. The goal is to help readers clearly understand how sanctions protect the safety and wellbeing of older Australians.